PMPยฎ Master Dump Sheet
Complete Brain Dump ยท Cheat Sheet ยท Exam Tips ยท Keyword Reference ยท Study Tracker
PMBOKยฎ 7th Ed
ECO 2021
Predictive + Agile + Hybrid
180 Questions
230 Minutes
๐ Exam Overview
Exam Format & Key Facts
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Questions | 180 total (5 are unscored pretests) |
| Time | 230 minutes (โ1 min 17 sec/question) |
| Breaks | 2 optional 10-min breaks (timer stops) |
| Format | Multiple choice, drag-drop, matching, hotspot, limited choices |
| Pass/Fail | No fixed pass score โ proficiency levels per domain |
| Split | ~50% Predictive / ~50% Agile & Hybrid |
| Experience Required | 36 months PM (degree) or 60 months (no degree) |
| PDUs | 60 PDUs every 3 years to maintain |
๐ด EXAM TIP: The PMP is not just PMBOK! Expect heavy Agile/Scrum scenarios. When in doubt, choose the answer that "talks to the team first," "updates the plan," or "looks at the root cause."
Three ECO Domains (2021)
| Domain | % of Exam | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 โ People | 42% | Leading teams, conflict, communication, stakeholders |
| 2 โ Process | 50% | Project execution, planning, predictive & agile methods |
| 3 โ Business Environment | 8% | Strategy, compliance, benefits, organizational change |
๐ฅ Domain 1 โ People (42%)
Leadership Styles
| Style | When to Use | Key Signal Words |
|---|---|---|
| Servant Leader | Agile / Scrum Master role; team is self-organizing | "Remove obstacles," "serve team," "facilitate" |
| Transactional | Routine tasks; rewards/penalties tied to performance | "Reward," "penalty," "carrot/stick" |
| Transformational | Innovation, change, inspire vision | "Inspire," "vision," "motivate," "change" |
| Laissez-Faire | Highly skilled, self-directed team โ minimal oversight | "Hands-off," "trust experts" |
| Autocratic / Directing | Crisis, safety, emergency โ quick decision needed | "Emergency," "crisis," "no time for consensus" |
| Democratic / Participative | Complex problems needing team input | "Vote," "team decision," "consensus" |
| Coaching | Developing team skills; junior team members | "Mentor," "develop skills," "grow" |
| Charismatic | Organizational rallying, morale boost | "Enthusiasm," "energy," "followers" |
| Interactional | Balance of task, relationship, and change | "Mix of styles" |
๐ด EXAM TIP: The PMP LOVES servant leadership. If a question mentions Agile/Scrum and asks "what should the PM do?" โ servant leadership is almost always the answer.
Conflict Management (Thomas-Kilmann)
| Method | Win/Lose | Best When |
|---|---|---|
| Collaborate / Problem-Solve | Win-Win โ BEST | Enough time; long-term relationship; complex issue |
| Compromise / Reconcile | Lose-Lose / Some-Some | Time pressure; equal power; temporary fix |
| Smoothing / Accommodating | Lose-Win | Relationship preservation; issue is minor for you |
| Forcing / Directing | Win-Lose โ WORST | Emergency; you have authority; safety issue |
| Withdrawal / Avoiding | Lose-Lose | Gather more data; let parties cool down |
๐ก TIP: Conflict resolution order on PMP: 1) Collaborate โ 2) Compromise โ 3) Smoothing โ 4) Forcing โ 5) Withdrawal. Always try problem-solving FIRST.
๐ SCENARIO: Two team members disagree on technical approach. PM should โ Meet with both to understand each perspective and work toward a solution everyone accepts (Collaborate).
Motivation Theories
| Theory | Key Concept | Exam Trigger Words |
|---|---|---|
| Maslow's Hierarchy | 5 levels: PhysiologicalโSafetyโSocialโEsteemโSelf-Actualization | Needs hierarchy, pyramid |
| Herzberg's Two-Factor | Hygiene factors (prevent dissatisfaction) vs Motivators (increase satisfaction) | Salary alone won't motivate; recognition does |
| McGregor X & Y | Theory X = people dislike work (need control); Theory Y = people are motivated, self-directed | "Micromanage" vs "trust team" |
| Vroom's Expectancy | Motivation = Expectancy ร Instrumentality ร Valence | EffortโPerformanceโReward chain |
| McClelland's Needs | Need for Achievement, Affiliation, Power | "This person thrives on competition/relationships/control" |
| Ouchi's Theory Z | Japanese style: lifetime employment, collective decision-making, holistic concern | Long-term loyalty, company as family |
Team Development โ Tuckman's Model
| Stage | What Happens | PM Action |
|---|---|---|
| Forming | Polite, uncertain, getting to know each other | Direct, set goals, establish norms |
| Storming | Conflict, power struggles, frustration | Coach, mediate, resolve conflict |
| Norming | Agreement, rules established, cohesion builds | Support, facilitate, praise |
| Performing | High performance, self-directed, productive | Delegate, trust, servant leadership |
| Adjourning | Project ending, team disbands | Celebrate, lessons learned, recognize |
๐ด EXAM TIP: Exam loves Tuckman! "Team arguing about roles" = Storming. "Team producing great results independently" = Performing.
Communication
Communication Channels Formula: N ร (N-1) / 2 where N = number of stakeholders
Example: 10 stakeholders โ 10 ร 9 / 2 = 45 channels
Adding 1 person to team of 10 โ goes from 45 to 55 channels (+10 new channels)
Adding 1 person to team of 10 โ goes from 45 to 55 channels (+10 new channels)
- Communication Types: Formal Written ยท Formal Verbal ยท Informal Written ยท Informal Verbal
- Communication Methods: Push (email, reports), Pull (intranet, databases), Interactive (meetings, calls)
- Noise: Anything that distorts the message (language, culture, distance, emotions)
- Sender-Receiver Model: Encode โ Message โ Medium โ Decode โ Feedback โ Noise
๐ด EXAM TIP: PM spends ~90% of time communicating. Important communications = Formal Written. Quick coordination = Interactive. Large one-way = Push.
Stakeholder Management
| Grid | Quadrant | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Power/Interest | High Power, High Interest | Manage Closely โ |
| High Power, Low Interest | Keep Satisfied | |
| Low Power, High Interest | Keep Informed | |
| Low Power, Low Interest | Monitor |
Stakeholder Engagement Levels:
- Unaware โ Resistant โ Neutral โ Supportive โ Leading
- Goal: Move stakeholders from current to desired engagement level
- C = Current, D = Desired (show in engagement assessment matrix)
โ๏ธ Domain 2 โ Process (50%)
Predictive / Waterfall Approach
- Sequential, plan-driven, detailed upfront planning
- Scope, schedule, cost defined at start (Triple Constraint)
- Change goes through formal Change Control Board (CCB)
- Deliverables produced at project end
- Best when: requirements stable, technology known, regulatory environment
5 Process Groups (PMBOK 6th โ Still Tested)
| Process Group | Key Documents Created | % Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Initiating | Project Charter, Stakeholder Register | Start Here |
| 2. Planning | Project Management Plan, all subsidiary plans, WBS, Schedule, Budget | Most documents |
| 3. Executing | Deliverables, Change Requests, Work Performance Data | Most $$ spent |
| 4. Monitoring & Controlling | Work Performance Reports, Change Requests, Forecasts | Runs entire project |
| 5. Closing | Final Report, Lessons Learned, Closed Contracts | Formal acceptance |
๐ด EXAM TIP: M&C runs throughout the entire project, not just at the end! If you see "comparing actual to planned," it's M&C.
10 Knowledge Areas
Integration ยท Scope ยท Schedule ยท Cost ยท Quality ยท Resource ยท Communications ยท Risk ยท Procurement ยท Stakeholder
๐ Mnemonic: I Saw Some Cool Quality Resources Communicating Risk Procurement Stakeholders
| KA | Key Plans | Key Processes |
|---|---|---|
| Integration | PM Plan, Project Charter | Develop Charter, Develop PM Plan, Direct & Manage, Monitor, Close |
| Scope | Scope Management Plan | Collect Requirements, Define Scope, Create WBS, Validate Scope, Control Scope |
| Schedule | Schedule Management Plan | Define Activities, Sequence, Estimate Durations, Develop Schedule, Control |
| Cost | Cost Management Plan | Plan, Estimate, Determine Budget, Control Costs |
| Quality | Quality Management Plan | Plan Quality, Manage Quality, Control Quality |
| Resource | Resource Management Plan | Plan, Estimate, Acquire, Develop Team, Manage Team, Control |
| Communications | Communications Management Plan | Plan, Manage, Monitor Communications |
| Risk | Risk Management Plan, Risk Register | Plan, Identify, Qualitative, Quantitative, Plan Responses, Implement, Monitor |
| Procurement | Procurement Management Plan | Plan, Conduct, Control Procurement |
| Stakeholder | Stakeholder Engagement Plan | Identify, Plan, Manage, Monitor Stakeholder Engagement |
Agile / Scrum Framework
๐ Scrum Roles
- Product Owner โ owns backlog, priorities
- Scrum Master โ servant leader, removes impediments
- Development Team โ self-organizing, cross-functional
๐ Scrum Events
- Sprint โ 1-4 week iteration
- Sprint Planning โ what & how
- Daily Scrum โ 15-min standup
- Sprint Review โ demo to stakeholders
- Sprint Retrospective โ improve process
๐ฆ Scrum Artifacts
- Product Backlog โ all features (PO owns)
- Sprint Backlog โ selected for sprint
- Increment โ working software
- Definition of Done โ quality standard
๐ Agile Metrics
- Velocity โ story pts per sprint
- Burndown Chart โ work remaining
- Burnup Chart โ work completed
- Cycle Time โ start to done
- Lead Time โ request to done
Agile Values (Agile Manifesto)
| We value... | Over... |
|---|---|
| Individuals and interactions | Processes and tools |
| Working software | Comprehensive documentation |
| Customer collaboration | Contract negotiation |
| Responding to change | Following a plan |
๐ด EXAM TIP: Agile doesn't mean NO documentation โ it means LESS is MORE. Working software is the primary measure of progress in Agile.
Kanban Key Concepts
- WIP Limit โ limit work in progress to reduce bottlenecks
- Kanban Board โ visual flow: To Do โ In Progress โ Done
- No fixed iterations (unlike Scrum's sprints)
- Pull system โ team pulls work when capacity available
Hybrid Approach
- Combines predictive (planning, governance) + agile (delivery, flexibility)
- Example: Use waterfall for procurement/contracts, Scrum for development sprints
- PM acts as both planner AND servant leader
๐ SCENARIO: Construction project with software component โ use predictive for physical construction (regulated), agile for software development (uncertain requirements).
Risk Management
| Step | Output | Key Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Plan Risk Management | Risk Management Plan | Meetings |
| Identify Risks | Risk Register, Risk Report | Brainstorming, SWOT, Checklists, Delphi |
| Qualitative Analysis | Updated Risk Register | Probability ร Impact Matrix |
| Quantitative Analysis | Numeric risk data | Monte Carlo, Decision Tree, EMV |
| Plan Risk Responses | Risk Response Plan | See strategies below |
| Implement Responses | Change Requests | Risk Register updates |
| Monitor Risks | Work Performance Info | Audits, Reserve Analysis |
Risk Response Strategies
| Type | Threats (Negative) | Opportunities (Positive) |
|---|---|---|
| Eliminate/Exploit | Avoid โ change plan to eliminate | Exploit โ ensure it happens |
| Reduce/Enhance | Mitigate โ reduce prob/impact | Enhance โ increase prob/impact |
| Transfer/Share | Transfer โ insurance, contract | Share โ partner/alliance |
| Accept | Accept โ active (contingency) or passive (budget) | |
| Escalate | Escalate โ beyond project scope, goes to program/portfolio | |
Expected Monetary Value (EMV):
EMV = Probability ร Impact ($)
Example: 30% chance of losing $10,000 โ EMV = -$3,000
Example: 40% chance of gaining $5,000 โ EMV = +$2,000
EMV = Probability ร Impact ($)
Example: 30% chance of losing $10,000 โ EMV = -$3,000
Example: 40% chance of gaining $5,000 โ EMV = +$2,000
๐ก TIP: Contingency Reserve = known unknowns (identified risks) | Management Reserve = unknown unknowns (unforeseen events). PM controls contingency; sponsor approves management reserve.
Quality Management
| Concept | Definition |
|---|---|
| Grade vs Quality | Grade = category of features. Quality = meeting requirements. Low grade โ low quality (a budget hotel can have high quality if it meets spec) |
| Prevention over Inspection | Build quality in โ don't just inspect it out. Cost of Prevention < Cost of Correction |
| Gold Plating | Adding extras not in scope โ BAD! Only deliver what is required |
| Cost of Quality (COQ) | Prevention + Appraisal + Internal Failure + External Failure |
| Six Sigma (6ฯ) | 99.99966% defect-free; 3ฯ = 99.73% |
Quality Tools (7 Basic)
- Fishbone/Ishikawa/Cause-Effect โ find root cause
- Pareto Chart โ 80/20 rule (80% problems from 20% causes)
- Control Chart โ monitor process stability (Rule of Seven!)
- Histogram โ frequency distribution
- Scatter Diagram โ correlation between variables
- Flowchart โ process flow, decision points
- Check Sheet โ tally defects by type/location
๐ด EXAM TIP โ Rule of Seven: 7 consecutive data points on same side of mean in control chart = process is out of control even if within limits!
Procurement & Contracts
| Contract Type | Buyer Risk | Seller Risk | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Price (FFP) | Low | High | Scope well-defined; buyer wants certainty |
| FP-EPA | Medium | Medium | Long duration; inflation adjustment |
| FPIF | Medium-Low | Medium | Incentivize performance; some uncertainty |
| T&M / TMCR | High | Low | Scope uncertain; short duration |
| CPFF | High | Low | R&D, exploratory; scope very uncertain |
| CPIF | Medium-High | Low-Medium | Motivate cost control |
| CPAF | High | Low | Subjective performance award |
๐ด EXAM TIP: Buyer risk increases as you go from Fixed Price โ T&M โ Cost Plus. Seller risk is highest in Fixed Price.
Change Management
- All changes go through Integrated Change Control
- Step 1: Identify change โ 2: Evaluate impact โ 3: CCB approves/rejects โ 4: Update plan โ 5: Communicate โ 6: Implement
- PM can NEVER approve changes that affect baseline without CCB (even sponsor can't bypass CCB without authority)
- Workaround = unplanned response to unidentified risk (no pre-planned response)
๐ข Domain 3 โ Business Environment (8%)
Benefits Realization
- Projects create outputs โ Outputs enable outcomes โ Outcomes produce benefits
- Business Case โ justifies why the project is worth doing (sponsor creates; PM implements)
- Benefits Register โ tracks planned vs actual benefits realization
- Benefits may be realized during or after project completion
Compliance & Governance
- PMO (Project Management Office) โ Supportive, Controlling, or Directive
- Governance โ Framework for decisions, authority, accountability
- PM must comply with laws, regulations, organizational policies
- If compliance issue found: Report it โ Escalate โ Do NOT ignore
| PMO Type | Authority Level | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive | Low (Consultative) | Provides templates, training, lessons learned |
| Controlling | Medium | Requires compliance with frameworks; audits |
| Directive | High | Directly manages projects; PMs report to PMO |
Strategic Alignment & Org Structures
| Structure | PM Authority | Resource Control |
|---|---|---|
| Functional | Little/None | Functional Manager |
| Weak Matrix | Limited | Functional Manager |
| Balanced Matrix | Low-Medium | Mixed (shared) |
| Strong Matrix | Medium-High | PM has more control |
| Projectized | High | PM |
| Composite/Hybrid | Varies | Mixed |
๐ด EXAM TIP: Functional org = PM has LEAST power. Projectized org = PM has MOST power. Matrix = middle ground with conflicts over resources.
๐งฎ Key Formulas โ EVM & More
Earned Value Management (EVM)
| Term | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| PV โ Planned Value | Budget allocated for work scheduled | What should have been done |
| EV โ Earned Value | % Complete ร BAC | Value of work actually done |
| AC โ Actual Cost | Actual money spent | What it actually cost |
| BAC โ Budget at Completion | Total project budget | Original approved budget |
Variance Analysis:
CV (Cost Variance) = EV โ AC [+ = under budget, โ = over budget]
SV (Schedule Variance) = EV โ PV [+ = ahead, โ = behind]
Performance Indices:
CPI (Cost Performance Index) = EV / AC [>1 = good, <1 = over budget]
SPI (Schedule Performance Index) = EV / PV [>1 = ahead, <1 = behind]
Forecasts:
EAC (Estimate at Completion) โ 4 formulas:
1. EAC = BAC / CPI (if current trend continues)
2. EAC = AC + ETC (new estimate for remaining)
3. EAC = AC + (BAC โ EV) (if current variance is atypical)
4. EAC = AC + [(BAC โ EV) / (CPI ร SPI)] (both impact forecast)
ETC (Estimate to Complete) = EAC โ AC
VAC (Variance at Completion) = BAC โ EAC
TCPI = (BAC โ EV) / (BAC โ AC) [must achieve this CPI to hit BAC]
CV (Cost Variance) = EV โ AC [+ = under budget, โ = over budget]
SV (Schedule Variance) = EV โ PV [+ = ahead, โ = behind]
Performance Indices:
CPI (Cost Performance Index) = EV / AC [>1 = good, <1 = over budget]
SPI (Schedule Performance Index) = EV / PV [>1 = ahead, <1 = behind]
Forecasts:
EAC (Estimate at Completion) โ 4 formulas:
1. EAC = BAC / CPI (if current trend continues)
2. EAC = AC + ETC (new estimate for remaining)
3. EAC = AC + (BAC โ EV) (if current variance is atypical)
4. EAC = AC + [(BAC โ EV) / (CPI ร SPI)] (both impact forecast)
ETC (Estimate to Complete) = EAC โ AC
VAC (Variance at Completion) = BAC โ EAC
TCPI = (BAC โ EV) / (BAC โ AC) [must achieve this CPI to hit BAC]
๐ EVM Example: BAC=$100K, 40% complete, AC=$50K
EV = 40% ร $100K = $40K | CV = $40K โ $50K = โ$10K (over budget!) | CPI = 40/50 = 0.80 (spending $1.25 for every $1 of value)
EV = 40% ร $100K = $40K | CV = $40K โ $50K = โ$10K (over budget!) | CPI = 40/50 = 0.80 (spending $1.25 for every $1 of value)
Other Key Formulas
Communication Channels: N(Nโ1)/2
PERT (3-Point Estimate): (O + 4M + P) / 6
PERT Standard Deviation: (P โ O) / 6
PERT Variance: [(P โ O) / 6]ยฒ
Float / Slack: LS โ ES or LF โ EF
Critical Path: Longest path (zero float)
ROI: (Benefit โ Cost) / Cost ร 100%
NPV: Higher NPV = preferred project (select highest)
IRR: Higher IRR = preferred project (select highest)
Payback Period: Shorter = preferred (select shortest)
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR): >1 = beneficial; > = better
PERT (3-Point Estimate): (O + 4M + P) / 6
PERT Standard Deviation: (P โ O) / 6
PERT Variance: [(P โ O) / 6]ยฒ
Float / Slack: LS โ ES or LF โ EF
Critical Path: Longest path (zero float)
ROI: (Benefit โ Cost) / Cost ร 100%
NPV: Higher NPV = preferred project (select highest)
IRR: Higher IRR = preferred project (select highest)
Payback Period: Shorter = preferred (select shortest)
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR): >1 = beneficial; > = better
๐ด EXAM TIP โ Project Selection: NPV highest = best. IRR highest = best. Payback period shortest = best. BCR >1 = viable. If NPV = $0, the IRR equals the discount rate.
๐ ITTO Highlights (Must-Know)
๐ ITTO = Inputs, Tools & Techniques, Outputs โ You don't need to memorize all 49 processes' ITTOs, but know the key patterns below.
| Process | Key Input | Key Tool | Key Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Develop Project Charter | Business Documents, Agreements | Expert Judgment, Meetings | Project Charter |
| Identify Stakeholders | Project Charter, Agreements | Stakeholder Analysis, Power/Interest Grid | Stakeholder Register |
| Develop PM Plan | Project Charter, Outputs from planning | Expert Judgment, Meetings, Checklist | Project Management Plan |
| Collect Requirements | Charter, Stakeholder Register | Interviews, Focus Groups, Surveys, Delphi | Requirements Documentation, Traceability Matrix |
| Create WBS | Scope Statement, Req. Documentation | Decomposition, Expert Judgment | WBS, WBS Dictionary, Scope Baseline |
| Develop Schedule | Activity list, Network diagram, Resource calendars | CPM, CCM, PERT, Resource Leveling | Schedule Baseline, Project Schedule |
| Identify Risks | PM Plan, Stakeholder Register, Project Docs | Brainstorming, SWOT, Checklists, Delphi | Risk Register, Risk Report |
| Control Quality | Project Docs, Deliverables, Work Perf. Data | 7 QC Tools, Testing, Inspection | Quality Control Measurements, Verified Deliverables |
| Close Project/Phase | PM Plan, Accepted Deliverables, Project Docs | Expert Judgment, Meetings, Data Analysis | Final Report, Lessons Learned, Closed Contracts |
Key ITTO Patterns to Remember
- Project Charter is KEY input to nearly every Initiating process
- PM Plan is KEY input to nearly every Planning, Executing, M&C process
- Expert Judgment + Meetings appear in almost every process
- Work Performance Data comes from Executing โ becomes Work Performance Information in M&C โ becomes Work Performance Reports for communication
- Change Requests are outputs of many Executing and M&C processes
- Lessons Learned Register is both input AND output throughout project
โ๏ธ Ethics & Professional Conduct (PMI Code)
4 Core Values
๐ฏ Responsibility
Take ownership; report issues; honor commitments; follow through๐ค Respect
Value others' perspectives; avoid harassment; give creditโ๏ธ Fairness
Make unbiased decisions; disclose conflicts of interest; be transparentโ Honesty
Don't lie, deceive, or manipulate; communicate truthfullyCommon Ethics Scenarios on Exam
| Situation | Correct Action |
|---|---|
| Team member doing something unethical | Confront directly first, then escalate if not resolved |
| Sponsor pressures you to hide schedule slip | Refuse; report accurate status regardless of politics |
| Offered a gift from vendor | Decline (or follow organizational policy) โ avoid conflict of interest |
| Discover competitor's confidential info | Do not use it; inform management; discard |
| You make a mistake that causes problems | Report it immediately; take responsibility; correct it |
| Asked to falsify reports | Absolutely refuse; escalate to PMO/sponsor/ethics hotline |
๐ด EXAM TIP: Ethics questions = always choose the most HONEST and TRANSPARENT option. Never choose to hide information, ignore problems, or act in self-interest.
โก Final Cheat Sheet โ Must-Know
Golden Rules โ Always True on PMP
- โ ALWAYS communicate issues first โ don't hide bad news
- โ Update the plan when things change โ don't just execute informally
- โ Identify root cause before jumping to solutions
- โ Involve the team in planning (especially in Agile)
- โ Follow the process โ go through CCB for scope/schedule/cost changes
- โ Escalate early when issue is beyond PM authority
- โ Refer to the plan โ if it's in the plan, follow it
- โ Sponsor creates the Charter, not the PM (PM helps develop it)
- โ PM is accountable even when work is delegated
- โ In Agile, retrospective = improve the process; review = show stakeholders results
- โ NEVER gold plate โ no extras outside scope
- โ NEVER skip risk management โ identify risks early and often
- โ NEVER bypass CCB for changes to project baselines
Top Exam Tips & Tricks
๐ด Q: Conflict arises in team? โ First: address directly with parties involved. Then: escalate if unresolved.
๐ด Q: Project is over budget? โ Analyze CPI, find root cause, create EAC, present options to sponsor. Do NOT simply cut scope without CCB.
๐ด Q: Stakeholder wants change? โ Evaluate impact, submit Change Request, wait for CCB. Even sponsor must go through CCB for baseline changes.
๐ด Q: Team member underperforming? โ Coach first; document; HR is last resort. Performance issues go: Coaching โ Training โ HR โ Replace.
๐ด Q: Risk was not identified and just happened? โ It's now an Issue. Implement a Workaround. Update Risk Register and Lessons Learned.
๐ด Q: Vendor delivers late? โ Refer to contract terms first. Check procurement management plan. Communicate formally.
๐ด Q: Scope creep happening? โ Say NO without a change request. Refer to scope statement. Submit CR if stakeholder insists.
๐ด Q: Team in new country/culture? โ Use Cultural Intelligence; learn norms; avoid assumptions; adapt communication style.
๐ด Q: "What should the PM do FIRST?" โ Check the plan, assess impact, communicate. Never jump to executing a solution without analysis.
๐ด Q: Project is in Agile โ impediment exists? โ Scrum Master removes impediments. PM / SM facilitate; team self-organizes.
๐ Keyword Index (Click to See Definition)
Click any keyword for a quick explanation:
Servant Leader
CCB
WBS
Baseline
Scope Creep
Gold Plating
Critical Path
Float/Slack
Fast Tracking
Crashing
Contingency Reserve
Management Reserve
EVM
CPI
SPI
BAC
EAC
ETC
PMO
Sprint
Retrospective
Velocity
Definition of Done
Burndown Chart
WIP Limit
Fishbone Diagram
Pareto Chart
Control Chart
PERT
Delphi Technique
Risk Register
Workaround
Integrated Change Control
Lessons Learned
Project Charter
Business Case
Triple Constraint
Six Sigma
Fixed Price (FFP)
T&M Contract
Maslow's Hierarchy
Collaborate
Forming Stage
Storming Stage
Product Owner
Scrum Master
Projectized Org
Functional Org
NPV
TCPI
EMV
Cultural Intelligence
Cost of Quality
Prevention over Inspection
โ Study Tracker โ Track Your Progress (Auto-Saved)
Topics Completed:
โ Progress Saved