✔ Auto-saved

📐 PMP Estimating — Complete Exam Study Guide

Domain: Process | All Approaches (Predictive, Agile, Hybrid) | Eng. Ahmad Safi, PE

1. What Is Estimating?

Estimating is the process of quantifying the likely amount of resources, time, or cost required to complete project work. It is NOT guessing — it is informed prediction based on data, experience, and judgment.

In the PMP context, estimating applies to three key areas:

  • 🕐 Schedule — How long will activities take?
  • 💰 Cost — How much money is needed?
  • 👷 Resources — How many people, equipment, materials?
Why It Matters on the Exam
Estimating questions appear across ALL three PMP domains. The exam tests whether you select the right technique for the scenario — not just whether you know definitions.

When Does Estimating Happen?

TimingActivityApproach
Early (Initiation)Order-of-magnitude estimateAnalogous or Parametric
PlanningDetailed budget & scheduleBottom-Up or Three-Point
ExecutingRevised estimates (re-estimating)EVM, forecasting
Agile SprintsStory point estimationPlanning Poker, Velocity
🎯 Exam Trap
Estimating is iterative — plans are progressively elaborated. Early estimates have wide ranges; late estimates narrow. The PMP exam tests if you know when to use which technique.
2. Why Estimating Matters

Poor estimating is one of the top causes of project failure. The PMP exam expects you to recognize the consequences of inaccurate estimates and the PM's responsibility.

⚠ Underestimating Causes
  • Budget overruns
  • Schedule delays
  • Scope cuts to compensate
  • Stakeholder dissatisfaction
  • Team burnout
⚠ Overestimating Causes
  • Wasted resources (Parkinson's Law)
  • Lost competitive bids
  • Reduced ROI
  • Slack absorbed (Student Syndrome)
  • Stakeholder distrust
✅ PM Best Practice
A good PM does NOT pad estimates — instead uses contingency reserves and management reserves formally documented in the project plan.
📌 Real-World Example
Ahmad's bridge inspection project: The PM estimated 3 weeks for deck replacement based on past projects (analogous). When actual scope was revealed — 40% more square footage — the estimate was formally revised using bottom-up, and a contingency reserve of 15% was added for weather delays.
3. Types of Estimates

Estimates vary in accuracy depending on the project phase and available information.

Estimate TypeAccuracy RangeWhen UsedAlso Called
Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM)-25% to +75%Initiation / FeasibilityBallpark estimate
Preliminary Estimate-15% to +50%Early PlanningConceptual estimate
Budget Estimate-10% to +25%Mid-planningAuthorization estimate
Definitive Estimate-5% to +10%Late PlanningControl estimate
Final/Control Estimate-3% to +5%Execution (baseline)Engineering estimate
🎯 Exam Question Pattern
"The project is in initiation — what type of estimate is most appropriate?" → ROM (-25% to +75%). Definitive estimates come late when requirements are clear.

Progressive Elaboration of Estimates

As the project progresses and more information becomes available, estimates are refined. This is rolling wave planning in action.

Estimate Accuracy Increases Over Time →

4. Estimating in PMBOK 7 / PMI Exam Context

PMBOK 7 shifted from process groups to performance domains and principles. Estimating now spans multiple domains:

  • 📋 Planning — Creating cost and schedule baselines
  • ⚙️ Project Work — Monitoring actuals vs. estimates
  • 📦 Delivery — Estimating value and features (Agile)
  • 📊 Measurement — EVM, forecasting, variance analysis
Predictive vs. Agile Estimating
Predictive (Waterfall)Agile
ROM → Definitive → BaselineStory Points → Velocity → Release Plan
Cost & Schedule BaselinesProduct Backlog + Sprint Velocity
Bottom-up, Parametric, Three-PointPlanning Poker, Affinity, T-shirt
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)Product Backlog / User Stories
✅ Key Principle
PMI PMP 2021+ exam is hybrid-aware. About 50% of questions relate to agile/hybrid approaches. You must know BOTH estimating worlds.
5. Analogous Estimating Top Tested

Analogous Estimating uses historical data from similar past projects to estimate the current project. It is a form of expert judgment supported by historical information.

✅ When to Use
  • Early phases (limited information)
  • Quick estimate needed
  • Similar past project exists
  • ROM or budget estimate needed
⚠ Limitations
  • Less accurate than bottom-up
  • Depends on quality of historical data
  • Requires similar context
  • Not suitable for unique projects
📌 Example
Last year's bridge deck rehabilitation cost $450,000 and took 6 weeks. The new bridge has a similar scope. Analogous estimate: ~$450K, ~6 weeks. If the new bridge is 20% larger: ~$540K, ~7.2 weeks (scaled analogous = parametric overlap).
🎯 Exam Tips
  • "Less accurate but quick" → Analogous
  • "Uses expert judgment + historical info" → Analogous
  • "Top-down estimate" → Analogous
  • Best in initiation or early planning
6. Parametric Estimating Top Tested

Parametric Estimating uses a statistical relationship between historical data and other variables (parameters) to calculate an estimate.

Core Formula
Estimate = Unit Cost × Quantity
Estimate = Rate per Hour × Number of Hours
Estimate = Cost per Square Foot × Total Area
📌 Examples
  • Construction: $85/sq ft × 5,000 sq ft = $425,000
  • Software: 20 hrs/function point × 500 FP = 10,000 hrs
  • Bridge Inspection: $1,200/span × 18 spans = $21,600
  • Training: 2 hrs/person × 50 staff = 100 hrs
✅ Strengths
  • More accurate than analogous
  • Scalable and repeatable
  • Works well with clear metrics
⚠ Weaknesses
  • Requires reliable historical data
  • Less useful for unique work
  • Data quality determines accuracy
🎯 Exam Tip
"Uses mathematical/statistical relationship" OR "rate × quantity" → Parametric. If you see "cost per unit" or "hours per task type" → Parametric!
7. Bottom-Up Estimating Most Accurate

Bottom-Up Estimating involves estimating the cost/duration of individual work packages or activities and then aggregating (rolling up) to get the total project estimate.

Requires a detailed WBS (Work Breakdown Structure).

📌 Example – Bridge Rehabilitation
Work PackageCost
Deck Removal$45,000
Rebar Inspection$12,000
Concrete Placement$98,000
Waterproofing$23,000
Traffic Control$18,000
Total Project Estimate$196,000
🎯 Exam Tips
  • "Most accurate estimate" → Bottom-Up
  • "Requires WBS / work packages" → Bottom-Up
  • "Time-consuming but thorough" → Bottom-Up
  • Best in detailed planning phase
  • "Aggregating individual estimates" → Bottom-Up
⚠ Limitation
Requires significant time and effort. Cannot be done early in the project when scope is unclear.
8. Three-Point Estimating (PERT) Top Tested

Three-Point Estimating uses three estimates to define an approximate range for an activity's duration or cost. It accounts for uncertainty and risk.

PERT (Weighted Average)
E = (O + 4M + P) / 6
SD = (P – O) / 6
Variance = SD²
Triangular (Simple Average)
E = (O + M + P) / 3

(No weighting — all equal)

Where: O = Optimistic, M = Most Likely, P = Pessimistic

📌 Worked Example
Activity: Install drainage pipes
O = 4 days, M = 7 days, P = 16 days

PERT: (4 + 4×7 + 16) / 6 = (4+28+16)/6 = 48/6 = 8 days
SD: (16-4)/6 = 12/6 = 2 days
Triangular: (4+7+16)/3 = 27/3 = 9 days

✅ PERT gives 8±2 days → 68% chance between 6-10 days; 95% chance between 4-12 days (±2 SD)
📋 Confidence Intervals (Sigma Rules)
RangeConfidence
E ± 1 SD (±1σ)68.27%
E ± 2 SD (±2σ)95.45%
E ± 3 SD (±3σ)99.73%
E ± 6 SD (±6σ)99.9997% (Six Sigma)
🎯 Exam Tips
  • PERT weights the most likely (×4) — use when risk matters
  • Triangular = simple average — equal weight to all three
  • "Accounts for uncertainty/risk" → Three-Point
  • The PMP exam often gives you O, M, P and asks for PERT or SD
  • PERT came from the Navy Polaris missile program (1958)
9. Expert Judgment

Expert Judgment involves consulting individuals or groups with specialized knowledge, training, or experience to estimate cost, duration, or resources.

Expert judgment is used as a tool in nearly every estimating technique — it is rarely used alone.

📌 Who Are Experts?
  • Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) from within the team
  • Consultants (e.g., licensed PEs, engineers)
  • Industry groups or professional associations
  • Stakeholders with domain expertise
  • PMO (Project Management Office)
  • Vendors and contractors
✅ Exam Note
On the PMP exam, when you see "the PM should consult with..." → think Expert Judgment. It is ALWAYS a valid input to estimating processes.
10. Reserve Analysis Top Tested

Reserve Analysis is used to determine the amount of contingency and management reserve needed to handle uncertainty in project estimates.

Contingency Reserve
  • Handles known unknowns (identified risks)
  • Part of the cost/schedule baseline
  • PM can approve use
  • Example: "10% reserve for weather delays"
Management Reserve
  • Handles unknown unknowns (unidentified risks)
  • NOT part of the baseline
  • Requires management approval to use
  • Example: Unexpected regulatory changes
Budget Relationships
Cost Baseline = Work Packages + Contingency Reserves
Project Budget = Cost Baseline + Management Reserve
BAC (Budget at Completion) = Cost Baseline
🎯 Critical Exam Trap
BAC = Cost Baseline (includes contingency) — NOT the total project budget. Management Reserve is ABOVE the baseline. Confusing these is a top exam mistake!
11. Cost Estimate Types

Cost estimates must account for all types of costs in a project:

Cost TypeDefinitionExample
Direct CostsDirectly traceable to projectLabor, materials, equipment
Indirect CostsShared overhead not directly attributedRent, utilities, admin staff
Fixed CostsDo not change with work volumeEquipment lease, permits
Variable CostsChange with output/volumeFuel, hourly labor, materials
Sunk CostsAlready spent — irrelevant to decisionsPast feasibility study cost
Opportunity CostValue of best alternative foregoneChoosing Project A over B
🎯 Exam Tips
  • Sunk costs should NOT influence future decisions — ignore them!
  • Opportunity cost → always pick the higher NPV project when choosing
  • "Shared overhead allocated to project" → Indirect Cost
  • Fixed costs remain constant regardless of how much work is done
12. Cost of Quality (CoQ)

Cost of Quality (CoQ) is the total cost of all efforts related to quality — both conformance and non-conformance costs.

Cost of Conformance (Good)
Prevention: Training, process documentation, reviews
Appraisal: Testing, inspection, audits

Money spent to avoid defects
Cost of Non-Conformance (Bad)
Internal Failure: Rework, scrap, defects found before delivery
External Failure: Warranty, liability, customer complaints

Money spent because of defects
📌 Example
Bridge project: Spending $5,000 on concrete testing (appraisal) prevents $80,000 in structural rework (internal failure). CoQ analysis justifies the investment.
13. Vendor Bid Analysis

Vendor Bid Analysis (also called Bid/Quote Analysis) examines bids and quotes from vendors to determine whether the proposed prices are reasonable and within the project budget.

  • Compares multiple vendor bids for the same scope
  • Identifies outliers (too high or too low)
  • Considers total cost of ownership, not just purchase price
📌 Example
Three contractors bid for bridge railing installation: $42,000 / $51,000 / $38,000. The $38K bid is significantly lower — PM investigates scope understanding before awarding.
✅ Exam Note
If a vendor's bid is unusually low → investigate scope interpretation before accepting. Lowest price ≠ best value.
14. Duration vs. Effort vs. Elapsed Time

These three concepts are heavily tested on the PMP exam — many candidates confuse them.

TermDefinitionExample
EffortTotal labor hours needed (person-hours)40 person-hours (2 workers × 20 hrs each)
DurationCalendar time from start to finish5 days (if 2 workers each work 4 hrs/day)
Elapsed TimeClock time including non-working periods7 calendar days (includes weekend)
Duration Formula
Duration = Effort / Number of Resources
(Assumes resources work full-time on the activity)
📌 Scenario
Task requires 80 person-hours of effort.
1 person working 8 hrs/day → 80/8 = 10 days duration
2 people working 8 hrs/day → 80/(2×8) = 5 days duration
But adding resources doesn't always cut duration proportionally → Brook's Law
🎯 Exam Trap
The exam may give you effort and ask for duration (or vice versa) — READ carefully which one they want.
15. Resource Estimating

Resource estimating determines the types and quantities of human resources, equipment, and materials required to complete project work.

Process: Estimate Activity Resources (Schedule Management)

  • What type of resource? (Skill level, specialty)
  • How many? (Number of personnel, machines)
  • When? (Availability, calendar)
  • Where? (Location-based resource availability)

Resource Histogram

A bar chart showing resource usage over time. Helps identify resource overallocation.

✅ Resource Smoothing vs. Leveling
Resource LevelingResource Smoothing
Changes critical path?YES (may extend)NO
Respects constraint?Resource limitsTime limits (float)
When used?Overallocation existsWithin float available
🎯 Exam Tips
  • Resource leveling → may delay project (ok)
  • Resource smoothing → uses float, won't delay project
  • Outputs: Resource requirements, Resource breakdown structure (RBS)
16. Velocity (Agile Estimating)

Velocity is the amount of work a team completes in a sprint, measured in story points. Used in Agile to forecast future sprint capacity.

Velocity Formula
Velocity = Total Story Points Completed per Sprint (average)

Estimated Sprints = Total Backlog Points / Average Velocity
Release Date = Today + (Estimated Sprints × Sprint Length)
📌 Example
Team completed: Sprint 1=22pts, Sprint 2=28pts, Sprint 3=25pts
Average Velocity = (22+28+25)/3 = 25 points/sprint
Remaining backlog = 200 points
Sprints remaining = 200/25 = 8 sprints
With 2-week sprints → ~16 weeks to completion
🎯 Exam Tips
  • Velocity is team-specific — not transferable across teams
  • New teams → use low/conservative initial velocity
  • Velocity improves over time as team matures
  • "Capacity-based sprint planning" uses velocity
17. Basis of Estimates (BOE)

The Basis of Estimates (BOE) is a document that explains HOW estimates were developed — the assumptions, constraints, and methodology used.

Think of it as the "show your work" document for estimates.

What BOE Includes
  • Estimating methodology used (analogous, parametric, etc.)
  • Assumptions made (e.g., 8-hr workday, no overtime)
  • Constraints identified
  • Range of possible outcomes (±%)
  • Confidence level of the estimate
  • Known risks that could affect the estimate
🎯 Exam Note
BOE is an OUTPUT of Estimate Costs and Estimate Activity Durations processes. When asked "what documents justify how the estimate was made?" → Basis of Estimates.
18. Estimate Accuracy Ranges (Detailed)

Different sources list slightly different ranges. The PMP exam tests the general concept — not exact numbers. Know the pattern:

Estimate ClassAccuracyPhaseTechnique
ROM (Rough Order of Magnitude)-25% to +75%InitiationAnalogous
Conceptual/Feasibility-15% to +50%Early PlanningAnalogous/Parametric
Preliminary/Budget-10% to +25%Mid-PlanningParametric/Bottom-Up
Definitive/Control-5% to +10%Detailed PlanningBottom-Up
📌 Scenario
Sponsor asks: "How much will this project cost?" during feasibility — PM says "$500,000 ± 50% ROM." This is acceptable. In detailed planning, the same answer would be unacceptable — a definitive estimate is expected.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Estimates get more precise as the project progresses. The PMP exam expects you to match estimate accuracy to project phase.
19. EVM Metrics (Earned Value Management) Heavy Exam Weight

Earned Value Management (EVM) integrates scope, schedule, and cost to measure project performance against the baseline.

📋 EVM Core Variables
VariableMeaningAlso Known As
PVPlanned Value — budgeted cost for work scheduledBCWS
EVEarned Value — budgeted cost for work performedBCWP
ACActual Cost — actual cost for work performedACWP
BACBudget at Completion — total project budget
📋 Variances & Performance Indices
MetricFormulaGood if...
Schedule Variance (SV)EV – PVSV > 0 (ahead)
Cost Variance (CV)EV – ACCV > 0 (under budget)
Schedule Performance Index (SPI)EV / PVSPI > 1 (ahead)
Cost Performance Index (CPI)EV / ACCPI > 1 (under budget)
📌 Worked Example
Project: 6-month bridge painting, BAC = $120,000
At Month 3: PV = $60,000 | EV = $48,000 | AC = $55,000

SV = 48K – 60K = –$12,000 → Behind schedule
CV = 48K – 55K = –$7,000 → Over budget
SPI = 48/60 = 0.80 → 80% of schedule efficiency
CPI = 48/55 = 0.87 → Getting $0.87 of value per $1 spent
🎯 Memory Trick
EV is always in the middle!
SV = EV – PV (E–P: "Earned minus Planned")
CV = EV – AC (E–A: "Earned minus Actual")
20. Forecasting — ETC & EAC Top Tested

Forecasting estimates the future cost to complete remaining work based on current performance.

📋 Forecasting Formulas
FormulaWhen to Use
ETC = EAC – ACHow much MORE is needed to finish
EAC = BAC / CPICurrent CPI will continue (most common)
EAC = AC + ETC (bottom-up)Re-estimate remaining work fresh
EAC = AC + (BAC – EV)Past variance was atypical; future at planned rate
EAC = AC + [(BAC–EV)/(CPI×SPI)]Both cost and schedule performance matter
TCPI — To Complete Performance Index
TCPI(BAC) = (BAC – EV) / (BAC – AC)
TCPI(EAC) = (BAC – EV) / (EAC – AC)

If TCPI > 1 → must work MORE efficiently than current
If TCPI < 1 → can afford to be LESS efficient
📌 Scenario
BAC=$120K, EV=$48K, AC=$55K, CPI=0.87
EAC = 120K / 0.87 = $137,931 (most likely final cost)
ETC = 137,931 – 55,000 = $82,931 (remaining cost)
VAC = BAC – EAC = 120,000 – 137,931 = –$17,931 (over budget at completion)
🎯 Exam Tip
The most COMMON EAC formula is BAC/CPI — used when current efficiency is expected to continue. The exam will describe a scenario and you must pick the right formula!
21. Story Points (Agile) Agile Domain

Story Points are a unit of measure for expressing the overall effort or complexity required to fully implement a product backlog item (user story). They are relative, not absolute (not hours).

✅ What Story Points Measure
  • Complexity of the work
  • Amount of work (effort)
  • Uncertainty/risk
  • Technical debt potential
Common Scales Used
  • Fibonacci: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21...
  • T-Shirt: XS, S, M, L, XL
  • Powers of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16
  • Linear: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...
📌 Example
Story A (login feature) = 3 points
Story B (dashboard redesign) = 13 points
Story B is ~4× more complex than Story A — but NOT necessarily 4× the hours.
🎯 Exam Trap
Story points are NOT hours or days. They measure relative complexity. Teams cannot directly compare story points across different teams.
22. Planning Poker Agile Domain

Planning Poker is a consensus-based estimating technique used in Agile teams. Each team member selects a card with a story point value. Cards are revealed simultaneously to prevent anchoring bias.

How It Works

  1. Product Owner reads a user story
  2. Team members ask clarifying questions
  3. Each member selects a card (secretly)
  4. All cards revealed at the same time
  5. Outliers explain their reasoning
  6. Process repeats until consensus is reached
✅ Why Simultaneous Reveal?
Prevents anchoring bias — the tendency to be influenced by the first number heard. Everyone estimates independently first.
🎯 Exam Notes
  • Planning Poker = Delphi-like technique (consensus through rounds)
  • "Prevents groupthink" → Planning Poker
  • Cards reveal simultaneously to avoid anchoring
  • No manager/senior dominance in estimates
23. T-Shirt Sizing Agile Domain

T-Shirt Sizing is a quick, relative estimating technique using clothing sizes (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) to categorize work items. Used for high-level backlog grooming.

📌 Example
SizePoints EquivalentExample Task
XS1Fix a typo on a webpage
S2Add a validation rule
M5Build a search filter
L13Redesign checkout flow
XL21+Integrate payment gateway
✅ When to Use T-Shirt Sizing
Early backlog grooming, roadmap planning, or when the team is just getting started and doesn't have enough detail for story points yet.
24. Affinity Estimating Agile Domain

Affinity Estimating is a fast technique where the team groups user stories into buckets (like T-shirt sizes or point groups) by similarity — without detailed discussion of each item individually.

How It Works

  1. Write each backlog item on a card
  2. Team silently sorts cards into groups by relative size
  3. Label groups with point values or T-shirt sizes
  4. Discuss outliers and re-sort as needed
✅ When to Use
Large backlogs (50+ stories) that need quick relative sizing. Much faster than Planning Poker for initial estimates.
🎯 Exam Note
Affinity estimating is used for large-scale, rapid relative sizing. "The team needs to quickly estimate 100 backlog items" → Affinity Estimating.
25. 🔑 Master Formulas Cheat Sheet
📋 Three-Point Estimating
PERT = (O + 4M + P) / 6
Triangular = (O + M + P) / 3
SD = (P – O) / 6  |  Variance = SD²
📋 EVM — Variances
SV = EV – PV  |  CV = EV – AC
SPI = EV / PV  |  CPI = EV / AC
📋 EVM — Forecasting
EAC = BAC / CPI   (CPI continues)
EAC = AC + (BAC – EV)   (past atypical)
EAC = AC + ETC   (fresh re-estimate)
ETC = EAC – AC
VAC = BAC – EAC
TCPI(BAC) = (BAC – EV) / (BAC – AC)
📋 Schedule / Resource
Duration = Effort / Resources
Velocity = Points Completed / Sprint
Sprints to Complete = Remaining Points / Velocity
📋 Budget Hierarchy
Cost Baseline = Work Packages + Contingency Reserve
Project Budget = Cost Baseline + Management Reserve
BAC = Cost Baseline (NOT project budget!)
📋 Confidence Intervals (Sigma)
±1σ = 68.27% | ±2σ = 95.45% | ±3σ = 99.73% | ±6σ = 99.9997%
26. 📖 Keywords Glossary (Click to Explore)

Click any keyword below for a quick definition:

Analogous Estimating Parametric Estimating Bottom-Up Estimating Three-Point Estimating PERT Expert Judgment Reserve Analysis Contingency Reserve Management Reserve EVM CPI SPI EAC ETC TCPI BAC WBS Basis of Estimates Story Points Velocity Planning Poker T-Shirt Sizing Affinity Estimating Sunk Cost Opportunity Cost Progressive Elaboration Rolling Wave Planning Student Syndrome Brook's Law Parkinson's Law Anchoring Bias Resource Overallocation Cost of Quality (CoQ) Vendor Bid Analysis ROM Estimate Informed Prediction
27. 🎯 Exam Tips, Traps & Cheat Codes
🔴 Top 10 PMP Exam Traps in Estimating
  1. BAC ≠ Project Budget — BAC = Cost Baseline. Management Reserve is separate.
  2. Sunk costs are irrelevant — never factor them into future decisions.
  3. Story points ≠ hours — they measure relative complexity, not time.
  4. ROM range is wide — -25% to +75%, not symmetrical!
  5. Analogous is TOP-DOWN — uses historical data from similar projects.
  6. Bottom-up is MOST ACCURATE — but takes the most time.
  7. PERT weights Most Likely 4× — Triangular gives equal weight.
  8. Contingency reserve ≠ Management reserve — different approval levels.
  9. CPI < 1 = OVER BUDGET — CPI > 1 = under budget (less intuitive!).
  10. Resource leveling may EXTEND the schedule — smoothing does NOT.
✅ Quick Decision Framework
Exam Says...Answer Is...
Early estimate, limited info, quickAnalogous
Rate × quantity, mathematicalParametric
Most accurate, detailed, WBSBottom-Up
Accounts for uncertainty/riskThree-Point/PERT
Agile sprint capacityVelocity
Agile consensus estimatingPlanning Poker
100 backlog items, quick sortAffinity Estimating
Known unknowns → reserveContingency Reserve
Unknown unknowns → reserveManagement Reserve
CPI continues → final cost?EAC = BAC/CPI
Past was atypical → final cost?EAC = AC + (BAC–EV)
📋 Memory Mnemonics
  • "BIG → BAC / small → EV–AC": Budget is Big (BAC), Earned is always in the middle (EV–PV, EV–AC)
  • "P4M": PERT = (O + 4M + P) / 6 — four times Most Likely
  • "SV Positive = Speedy; CV Positive = Cash saved"
  • "CPI < 1 = Cost Problem" — over budget despite counterintuitive direction
  • "Contingency = Known | Management = Mystery"
  • "Analogous = Similar past story"
🧠 Scenario Practice
Q: A PM is asked for a cost estimate during the project charter phase. Limited scope definition exists. The sponsor needs an answer by tomorrow. Which technique should the PM use?
Analogous Estimating — early phase, limited info, quick turnaround required. Use historical data from a similar project.
🧠 Scenario Practice
Q: Project BAC=$200K. At midpoint: PV=$100K, EV=$80K, AC=$95K. Which statement is TRUE?
✅ SV = 80K–100K = –$20K (behind schedule). CV = 80K–95K = –$15K (over budget). CPI = 80/95 = 0.84 (over budget). EAC = 200K/0.84 = $238,095 projected final cost.
28. 📝 Practice Quiz (Auto-Graded)
29. 📓 My Notes & Study Review

Your notes are auto-saved to this browser. Type freely.

📊 My Study Progress Tracker