📘 Project Management
Book Overview & Structure
This textbook covers the complete spectrum of modern project management — from structured Traditional PM to flexible Agile PM to modern Hybrid PM.
The running case study throughout the book is the Ei-Ti AG Christmas Party Project, managed by Laura Leiter (PM), Sabine Schein, and Sven Soft — illustrating every method in practice.
Project Management Fundamentals
1.1 What Is a Project?
The concept of Projectification describes the growing shift toward project-based work driven by globalisation, digitalisation, and complexity.
Six Key Project Characteristics
| Characteristic | Meaning | PM Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Novel / Unique | The result has never been created before | Requires preparation, planning, and a project order |
| Goal Specification | Clear objectives must exist | Managed as the "Project Goal" element |
| Temporary | Defined start and end dates | Time management element critical |
| Project Budget | Financial limits are set | Cost management element required |
| Project Organisation | Specific team structure created | Organisation/communication element required |
| Risk | Uncertainties exist throughout | Risk element managed proactively |
Three Forms of Work
- Routine Activity — Repetitive, standardised, no project methods needed
- Project — Unique, temporary, complex, requires PM methods
- Semi-Project / Task — Between routine and full project; lighter management
1.2 Project Constraints (The Magic Triangle)
- Scope/Quality — What must be delivered and to what standard?
- Time — When must it be delivered?
- Cost/Resources — What budget and personnel are available?
- Risk — What uncertainties exist?
- Stakeholder — Who are the individuals/groups that can influence the project?
1.3 Project Phases
1.4 Project, Programme & Portfolio
| Level | Definition | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Project | Unique, temporary undertaking with specific goals | Delivering project results |
| Programme | Group of related projects managed together for benefits not achievable individually | Strategic benefit realisation |
| Portfolio | Collection of projects/programmes that don't necessarily have to be related — aligned to strategic objectives | Strategic alignment & resource optimisation |
1.5 Major PM Standards
| Standard | Origin | Focus | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMBOK 7 | PMI (USA) | Knowledge areas → now Principles | 12 principles, 8 performance domains |
| PRINCE2 | UK Govt | Process-based, stage gates | 7 principles, 7 themes, 7 processes |
| ICB4 / IPMA | IPMA (EU) | Competency-based | People, Practice, Perspective eye model |
| DIN 69901 | Germany | Process model | 5-part standard, process-oriented |
| ISO 21500 | International | Process groups & subject groups | International framework for PM |
1.6 Project Management Elements
The PM Elements are the core dimensions that must be planned and controlled throughout every project:
1.7 Project Organisation & Roles
| Role | Abbreviation | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Project Owner / Sponsor | PO | Authorises project; allocates budget; strategic decisions |
| Project Manager | PM | Day-to-day management; plans, controls, and leads the team |
| Project Core Team Member | PCM | Subject-matter expert; leads work packages |
| Project Staff | PS | Executes work package tasks |
| Steering Committee | SC | Senior governance; resolves escalated issues |
Three Organisational Integration Structures
| Structure | PM Authority | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Functional (Pure) | Low — department heads dominate | Small, short, single-department projects |
| Matrix | Shared between PM and functional heads | Medium complexity; cross-departmental |
| Pure Project (Autonomous) | High — PM has full authority | Large, long, strategic projects |
1.8 Procedural Models Overview
Project Initiation
The initiation phase is where a project is formally recognised and approved. Key activities: describing the project, evaluating its worthiness, selecting the PM approach, defining goals, analysing stakeholders, and issuing the project charter.
2.1 Project Canvas
2.2 Project Evaluation & Worthiness
Before officially launching a project, it must pass an evaluation on:
- Project Worthiness — Does it qualify as a project (not routine)?
- Project Type Determination — Internal/external, product/service, R&D?
- Economic Evaluation — ROI, NPV, payback period, cost-benefit analysis
- Technical/Substantive Evaluation — Is it technically feasible?
2.3 Selecting the PM Approach — Stacey Matrix & Cynefin
2.4 Goal Setting — SMART Criteria
Poor goal: "Organise a good Christmas party."
SMART goal: "Organise a Christmas party for 250 employees on 15 December at the city hall, within a €50,000 budget, achieving a satisfaction rating of ≥4.0/5.0 in the post-event survey."
Goal Hierarchy
2.5 Stakeholder Management
Four-Step Stakeholder Process
- Identify — List all possible stakeholders
- Analyse — Assess influence, interest, and attitude (positive/neutral/negative)
- Plan Measures — Define engagement strategies per stakeholder group
- Control — Monitor stakeholder attitudes throughout the project
2.6 Project Charter
It includes: project name, goals, deliverable, budget, timeline, PM name, team composition, risks, and signatures of PM and project owner.
2.7 Key Initiation Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Mind Map | Brainstorming and visual idea organisation |
| Ishikawa / Fishbone | Root cause analysis of problems |
| SWOT Analysis | Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats |
| Utility Analysis (Nutzwertanalyse) | Multi-criteria scoring to compare options |
| NPV / ROI | Economic evaluation of project worthiness |
| Stacey Matrix / Cynefin | Selecting the appropriate PM approach |
Traditional Project Management
Traditional (plan-driven) PM is structured around three phases: Planning, Controlling, and Closure. It is most effective when requirements are well-defined upfront.
3.1 Quality Planning
Quality Management in Projects has three components:
- Quality Planning — Define quality criteria and requirements upfront
- Quality Assurance — Systematic processes to ensure quality is being achieved during execution
- Quality Control — Measuring actual results against quality criteria; tests, inspections, reviews
3.2 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
- 100% Rule — The WBS captures 100% of project work; nothing inside is outside it
- Mutually Exclusive — No work package overlaps with another
- Work Package — The lowest element; has an owner, duration, effort, and cost
3.3 Organisation & Communication — RACI Matrix
| Work Package | PM (Laura) | Sabine | Sven | CEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venue booking | A | R | C | I |
| Catering management | A | C | R | I |
| Mobile app launch | A | I | C | I |
| Invitations / RSVP | A | R | R | I |
Communication Planning
A Communication Plan defines WHO gets WHAT information, HOW, and WHEN throughout the project. Key formats: status meetings, steering committee reports, email updates, and kick-off meetings.
3.4 Time Management & Scheduling
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Effort | Person-days/hours of work required (e.g., 10 person-days) |
| Duration | Calendar time from start to finish of a task (e.g., 5 working days) |
| Milestone | Significant checkpoint with zero duration — marks project progress |
| Critical Path | Longest sequence of dependent tasks; any delay here delays the project |
| Float/Buffer | Time a task can be delayed without delaying the project end |
Network Diagram (Critical Path Method)
Bar Chart (Gantt Chart)
3.5 Resource & Cost Planning
Resource Plan — Assigns human resources (person-days) and equipment to each work package per time period. Helps identify over-allocation and resource conflicts.
Resource Levelling — Adjusting schedules to smooth out resource demand peaks, either by moving tasks within their float, splitting work, or adding resources.
Cost Plan — Aggregates costs of all work packages by cost type (personnel, materials, travel, external services) and time period. Shows planned expenditure as a Cost Histogram and S-curve.
3.6 Risk Management
Four Risk Response Strategies
| Strategy | When to Use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Avoid | High-impact risks — change the plan to eliminate the risk | Change venue to avoid weather risk |
| Reduce/Mitigate | Medium risks — reduce probability or impact | Book backup catering vendor |
| Transfer | Financial risks — shift to third party | Take out event cancellation insurance |
| Accept | Low risks or residual risks — conscious decision to tolerate | Accept minor weather inconvenience |
3.7 Project Controlling
Key Controlling Tools
| Tool | What It Controls |
|---|---|
| Progress Reports / Status Reports | Overall project health (traffic lights: green/yellow/red) |
| Milestone Trend Analysis (MTA) | Forecasting if milestones will be met on time |
| Bar Chart (Actual vs Planned) | Schedule deviation for individual tasks |
| Earned Value Management (EVM) | Integrated cost/schedule performance |
| Mood Barometer | Social controlling — team morale and motivation |
3.8 Earned Value Management (EVM)
| Parameter | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| PV (Planned Value) | Budget × Planned% complete | What you planned to spend by now |
| EV (Earned Value) | Budget × Actual% complete | Value of work actually done |
| AC (Actual Cost) | Real expenditure to date | What you actually spent |
| SV (Schedule Variance) | EV − PV | Positive = ahead of schedule |
| CV (Cost Variance) | EV − AC | Positive = under budget |
| SPI (Schedule Performance Index) | EV / PV | >1 = ahead, <1 = behind schedule |
| CPI (Cost Performance Index) | EV / AC | >1 = under budget, <1 = over budget |
Budget = €50,000 | Planned 60% complete by W12 | Actual 50% complete | Spent €32,000
PV = €30,000 | EV = €25,000 | AC = €32,000
SV = €25k − €30k = −€5,000 (behind schedule)
CV = €25k − €32k = −€7,000 (over budget)
SPI = 25/30 = 0.83 | CPI = 25/32 = 0.78 → significant trouble!
3.9 Project Closure
- Formal acceptance/handover of deliverables to client/operations
- Release of project team members back to functional departments
- Completion of all documentation and archiving
- Final Report — documents what was delivered, budget actuals, lessons learned
- Lessons Learned Workshop — structured retrospective to improve future projects
- Closing contracts with vendors/suppliers
Agile Project Management
4.1 The Agile Manifesto — Four Values
Agile Manifesto (2001) — Four Core Values:
| We value MORE… | …over |
|---|---|
| ✅ Individuals and Interactions | Processes and Tools |
| ✅ Working Software/Product | Comprehensive Documentation |
| ✅ Customer Collaboration | Contract Negotiation |
| ✅ Responding to Change | Following a Plan |
Note: The right column is NOT wrong — the left column is simply valued MORE.
4.2 Scrum Framework
Scrum Roles
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Product Owner (PO) | Defines and prioritises the Product Backlog; represents customer; decides what gets built |
| Scrum Master (SM) | Facilitates Scrum; removes impediments; coaches the team; NOT a project manager |
| Development Team | Self-organising, cross-functional team of 3–9 that delivers the Sprint increment |
Scrum Artefacts
| Artefact | Content | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Product Backlog | Prioritised list of all features/requirements (User Stories) | Product Owner |
| Sprint Backlog | Subset of Product Backlog selected for the current Sprint | Development Team |
| Product Increment | Shippable product after each Sprint — must meet Definition of Done | Development Team |
| Burn-down Chart | Graph showing remaining work vs. time in Sprint | Scrum Master |
Scrum Events
Daily Scrum — 3 Questions (15 min)
- What did I accomplish yesterday?
- What will I accomplish today?
- Are there any impediments blocking my progress?
Agile Estimation — Story Points & Planning Poker
Story Points — Relative measure of complexity/effort for a User Story (not calendar time). Uses Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21…
Planning Poker — Team members simultaneously reveal their estimates (cards) and discuss differences until consensus. Prevents anchoring bias.
Velocity — Story points completed per Sprint; used to forecast future Sprints.
4.3 Kanban
Scrum vs. Kanban — Key Differences
| Aspect | Scrum | Kanban |
|---|---|---|
| Timeboxing | Fixed Sprints (1–4 weeks) | Continuous flow, no fixed iterations |
| Roles | PO, SM, Dev Team (prescribed) | No prescribed roles |
| Changes | No changes during a Sprint | Changes allowed anytime |
| WIP Limits | Implicit (Sprint capacity) | Explicit WIP limits per column |
| Best for | Product development with clear iterations | Maintenance, support, operational work |
4.4 Design Thinking
4.5 Agile vs. Traditional — Key Differences
| Aspect | Traditional PM | Agile PM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Fixed upfront | Flexible/emergent |
| Time & Cost | Variable (adjusts to scope) | Fixed (Sprint duration/budget) |
| Customer involvement | At beginning and end | Continuous throughout |
| Change management | Formal change request process | Changes welcomed anytime |
| Documentation | Comprehensive upfront | Minimal (just enough) |
| Planning horizon | Detailed plans for entire project | Detailed for next Sprint only |
| Team structure | Hierarchical roles | Self-organising, cross-functional |
| Risk tolerance | Low (mitigate early) | Embraces uncertainty/learning |
Hybrid Project Management
Hybrid PM combines traditional and agile elements, adapting the approach to the specific context. The Hybrid Continuum shows that approaches exist on a spectrum.
5.1 Six Hybrid Approach Types
| Type | Code | Description | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional with Agile Methods | TA-AM | Traditional framework but uses agile tools (e.g., Kanban, retrospectives) | Stable scope with some agile team practices |
| Traditional with Serial Agile Phases | TA-AP s | Traditional phases, but one or more phases run in Scrum/agile mode sequentially | One uncertain phase in otherwise clear project |
| Traditional with Parallel Agile Phases | TA-AP p | Traditional and agile workstreams run in parallel | Hardware (trad) + Software (agile) in parallel |
| Traditional and Agile Approaches | TuAA | Different sub-projects use different approaches fully | Large programs with diverse sub-projects |
| Agile with Traditional Methods | AA-TM | Agile core but uses traditional tools (e.g., Gantt for reporting) | Agile team needing traditional reporting to stakeholders |
| Freestyle | — | Custom mix tailored to specific project needs | Highly unique, experienced teams only |
5.2 Selecting the Hybrid Approach
The selection is guided by multiple factors assessed with a Trend Table that evaluates:
- Clarity of requirements (clear → traditional; unclear → agile)
- Technology certainty (known → traditional; novel → agile)
- Team experience with agile (low → traditional; high → agile)
- Customer availability for collaboration (unavailable → traditional; available → agile)
- Regulatory/contractual constraints (strict → traditional; flexible → agile)
5.3 Designing Hybrid Models — Four Dimensions
- Structure — How are the project phases organised? (Sequential/parallel/iterative)
- Functions — Which PM functions/elements apply? (Adapted per phase)
- Methods — Which specific methods/tools are used? (Mix from both approaches)
- People — What skills, roles, and culture is needed to make it work?
5.4 Optional & Adjacent Disciplines
| Discipline | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Procurement Management | Make-or-buy decisions; vendor selection process; RFP/tendering |
| Contract Management | Fixed-price vs. T&M contracts; legal constellations; contract types for projects |
| Claim Management | Managing disputes, additional payments, scope changes against contract |
| Change Management | Managing the human side of organisational change (not scope changes) |
| Project Marketing | Internal communication and "selling" the project to stakeholders throughout |
- Shock / Surprise
- Denial
- Anger / Frustration
- Bargaining
- Depression / Deep resignation
- Acceptance
- Integration / Problem-solving
Project managers must understand these phases and adapt their communication and leadership approach accordingly.
Personal & Social Competencies (Soft Skills)
Research consistently shows that the people side of project management — not the technical tools — is the primary driver of project success or failure.
6.1 Self-Management
| Competency | Key Concept | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Self-perception | Knowing your strengths, blind spots, triggers | Johari Window, 360° feedback |
| Goal Management | Personal SMART goals; continuous development | Personal development plan |
| Motivation | Understanding what drives you and your team | Maslow's Hierarchy, Herzberg |
| Time Management | Prioritising the right tasks | Eisenhower Matrix, ALPEN Method |
| Stress/Health Management | Preventing burnout, recognising exhaustion | SOR Model; 7 phases of exhaustion |
Eisenhower Matrix — Time Management
6.2 Communication
Schulz von Thun — Four Aspects of Every Message:
- 📋 Factual content — What information is being transmitted?
- 🤝 Relationship — What does the sender think of the receiver?
- 💬 Self-revelation — What does the message reveal about the sender?
- 📣 Appeal — What does the sender want the receiver to do?
Communication problems arise because sender and receiver "hear" different aspects of the same message.
6.3 Leadership
| Leadership Style | When to Use |
|---|---|
| Directing/Telling | Low competence, high commitment (new team members); tell them exactly what to do |
| Coaching/Selling | Some competence, lower commitment; explain and discuss the why |
| Supporting/Participating | High competence, variable commitment; facilitate and support |
| Delegating | High competence AND commitment; delegate full responsibility |
6.4 Team Management — Tuckman Model
6.5 Conflict Management
5 Conflict Resolution Strategies (Thomas-Kilmann):
- Competing — Win/Lose; use when a quick decision is needed and you're right
- Collaborating — Win/Win; best long-term solution; time-intensive
- Compromising — Partial Win/Partial Win; middle ground
- Accommodating — Lose/Win; give in to preserve relationship
- Avoiding — No Win/No Win; temporary; can't be the only strategy
Multi-Project Management
7.1 Programme Management
Programme management focuses on:
- Coordinating interdependencies between component projects
- Managing shared resources across the programme
- Realising strategic benefits that individual projects cannot achieve alone
- Stakeholder management at programme level
7.2 Portfolio Management
Portfolio Management Process
- Identify — Capture all project proposals and initiatives
- Evaluate & Score — Assess strategic importance, ROI, risk, resource needs
- Prioritise — Rank using scoring tables, dependency analysis
- Select & Approve — Decide which projects to start/continue/stop
- Control & Review — Ongoing monitoring; rebalance portfolio as needed
7.3 Project Management Office (PMO)
| Type | Role | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive PMO | Templates, training, best practices; advisory | Low — consultative |
| Controlling PMO | Standards compliance, audits, governance | Medium — sets requirements |
| Directive PMO | Directly manages projects; owns PMs | High — full authority |
Master Summary — All Methods & Tools at a Glance
📊 Complete Methods & Tools Reference (Table 8.1)
| PM Element | Planning Tools | Controlling Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Goals/Deliverable | Goal matrix, SMART, deliverable structure | Goal achievement status report |
| Quality | Quality criteria matrix, ISO standards | Audits, inspections, tests |
| Work (WBS) | WBS (PSP), Work package descriptions | Progress measurement (0/50/100%) |
| Organisation | Project organigramme, RACI matrix | Mood barometer, team feedback |
| Communication | Communication plan, document plan | Status meetings, reports |
| Time | Milestone plan, Network diagram, Gantt | MTA, Bar chart update, SPI |
| Resources | Resource plan, Resource histogram | Resource actuals vs. plan |
| Costs | Cost plan, S-curve | EVM (CV, CPI), Cost forecast |
| Risk | Risk register, Risk matrix | Risk review meetings |
| Stakeholder | Stakeholder table & matrix | Stakeholder attitude monitoring |
🌟 Critical Success Factors for Projects (from book)
⚡ Top Failure Causes:
- Unclear or changing goals
- Insufficient stakeholder management
- Poor communication
- Inadequate risk management
- Lack of top management support
- Unrealistic time/cost estimates
✅ Key Success Factors:
- Clear, SMART goals agreed by all
- Strong project manager leadership
- Active stakeholder engagement
- Continuous controlling & transparency
- Lessons Learned applied
- Right PM approach selected
- Magic Triangle: Scope ↔ Time ↔ Cost — changing one affects the others
- WBS 100% Rule: Captures ALL project work; lowest = work package
- Critical Path: Longest path; zero float; any delay = project delay
- EVM: SV=EV−PV; CV=EV−AC; SPI=EV/PV; CPI=EV/AC (above 1 = good)
- Project Charter: Issued by Sponsor; names the PM; formal authority
- SMART Goals: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound
- Scrum: Sprint=1-4 weeks; Daily=15min; Review=demo; Retro=improve
- Stakeholder Matrix: High influence/interest → Manage Closely
- Risk Responses: Avoid/Reduce/Transfer/Accept (threats); Exploit/Enhance/Share/Accept (opportunities)
- Tuckman: Forming→Storming→Norming→Performing→Adjourning
- RACI: Each WP has ONE Accountable person; Responsible does the work
- Hybrid: Use Stacey Matrix/Cynefin to determine; TA-AM most common type